|
Title: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on February 20, 2006, 03:33:42 PM Didn't I say the last episode was going to involve his Dad and why he went away?
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: John Davidson on February 20, 2006, 03:38:57 PM damp farts !
Bloody forgot to watch it. Oh well. hopefully its available on 'teleport' Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on February 21, 2006, 01:43:52 AM Was one of the best. You'll probably spit teeth though :)
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: John Davidson on February 21, 2006, 01:41:16 PM Thnakfully it is on Teleport replay ( I love cable when it works !) so I'll watch it later tonight and let you know how my gums are !
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: James Dodsworth on February 21, 2006, 01:42:03 PM Teleport is great, I hope they expand it to more channels though.
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: John Davidson on February 22, 2006, 12:51:16 AM aha.
next weeks episode is the last one. You had me going there. I didn't think too much of this weeks one. Nothing wrong with it per se, but it felt like a filler. Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on February 22, 2006, 01:48:31 AM I thought the bit where he started seeing the real world was great. It blows the he's just in a coma theory out the water.
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: James Dodsworth on February 22, 2006, 02:54:03 AM Does it? We know he knew the area in the present because he takes Gene there for a "real" curry. He could simply be having a coma-induced flashforward to his memory of what the area looks like in 2006.
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on February 22, 2006, 02:58:34 AM It reminded me of From Hell to be honest.
We know that the stimuli from his bedside is showing up, but this is the first time we've seen him getting stimuli not connected to that. Almost astrally projecting. Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Russell H on February 22, 2006, 04:31:30 AM Latest theories?
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on February 22, 2006, 05:03:34 AM Well obviously he is in a coma, but I do also think he's back in 1973 as we seem now to be about to change the past (or make sure the past happens the way it should have).
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: John Davidson on March 04, 2006, 03:50:21 PM What did everyone think of the last episode ?
Sadly I think they telegraphed everything except the very end which was (IMO) a massive cop out. Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on March 05, 2006, 04:13:08 AM I liked it, but it seems to lack the guts they showed on the first episode.
Where do they go from here? The only background element they seem to have unresolved is the test card girl. Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: mo ali on March 05, 2006, 12:07:53 PM The show may well collapse under its paradoxes but is there still any other feasible possibility to his situation besides time-travel/coma ?
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on March 05, 2006, 02:15:53 PM Mushrooms
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: James Dodsworth on March 05, 2006, 02:33:44 PM That'd be great, the entire series is Simms off his tits.
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Mark Peyton on March 05, 2006, 02:44:06 PM And at last we understand why John Simms took the role :)
Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: Russell H on March 08, 2006, 03:08:45 PM There are other solutions, y'know.
Acid? Title: Re: Life on Mars Post by: mo ali on March 09, 2006, 02:47:22 AM I was thinking that he's dead and he's going through a kind of 'quantum leap of the soul'..given a chance to work out his mistakes in life and what he could've done before resolving things and getting into the afterlife....atleast then the paradoxes wouldn't matter..might also explain why he's in the 70's as his childhood is full of unresolved/turbulent events
My Community | Powered by SMF 1.0.8.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved. |